Not Cricket


http://www.wikio.com web tracker
Listed in LS Blogs the Blog Directory and Blog Search Engine Sports Blogs - Blog Rankings Blog Directory TopBlogDir.blogspot.com button Cricket Blog Directory Visit blogadda.com to discover Indian blogs
Sports & Recreation Directory
Web Directory
Promote Your Blog
This site is listed on OmniCricket

Receive Email Updates

Can also be found at

contact me

Other big hitters I catch

Other non sporting blogs I read

September 2009 - Posts

Wait Listed again

India as a sporting and a travelling nation has returned back to its favourite RACing activities. What pray, is a RACing activity?, one may ask.

With peak travelling period approaching during the upcoming Diwali holidays, the railways are the preferred means of transport for the common man. In the railway booking parlance, RAC stands for Reservation against cancellation. This ticket is issued to a passenger who, needs to go on an overnight journey, but isn’t assured a sleeping berth by the Indian Railways. All Mamata di’s department does is to issue one a RAC ticket.

The RAC allows a passenger to board a train. He is even allotted a seat. If someone fails to show up, he is the privileged person to get that much sought sleeper berth. There’s another category that is the ‘Wait List’ (WL) which, basically doesn’t even let a person board a train. In the good old internet-free days, one had to call up the ever jammed reservation help line and in extreme cases actually go down to the railway station with hope in the eye and a hold-all on the shoulder. Even an atheist believed in the existence of GOD for that split second, when he was told that he had actually made it.

As a die hard JIT (just in time) faithful, one faced the RAC and the WL syndromes a few times in life. Many times, actually. It’s not for the faint hearted or the light butted either. Sitting for more than 12 hours in the night, is an activity desired only by certified masochists. The Wait List Syndrome where one keeps on checking one’s WL number online is a game waiting to be adapted for ‘Khatron ke Khiladi – Part xx’. This requires the courage of a supreme warrior, the cunning of a fox and the innocence of a baby, and if nothing works then the aloofness of the Buddha to pass unscathed. One has to use Saam (influence), Daam (money), Dand (brute force/punishment) and Bhed (division) to board that coveted train.

One has lost count of the number of times when India relies on the result of a match of which, it is not a part, to qualify for the next round. It has happened in hockey, cricket, even in individual sport, which works on a round robin format. We find ourselves in the same situation today, where so many permutations and combinations have appeared in the media that guarantee us a place in the semi final. All those What Ifs springing up like mushrooms in the monsoons are bugging to say the least.

Historically, India has been as lucky as one’s tries at the many lucky dips and draws that one has encountered to get a free meal. But why should one aspire for a lucky draw to get a free trip to Singapore. The easier way is to have even money saved to go on one’s own. Why wait for divine luck to intervene.

It’s the same RAC/ WL feeling coming all over again. One thinks that India is currently Wait Listed in the cricketing scheme of the world. The Australia- Pak encounter that starts earlier, may shift it to the RAC list. Does it get a berth on the track to the trophy? Unlikely.

Let’s have a confirmed reservation for once, Team India. One is tired of this entire wait listing business. One hopes that the Indians are not flying back by Air India, which has cancelled all its flights. Because in that case, the team may find itself on the Waiting List of other carriers.  

An evening with Virender Sehwag

 

An opportunity presented itself to attend a launch of a Cricket theme Debit Card by a British Bank on the eve of the India Pakistan clash. Now watching a cricket match on a giant screen with some free booze thrown in is not a very attractive proposition anymore. That too in a hall full of strangers. But the promised presence of Viru and Cheeka at the event, made the opportunity golden. The opportunity was gleefully accepted with both hands, much unlike Viraat Kohli and a few other Indian batters, who on the same day threw it away against Pakistan.

 After undergoing the trauma of an inane cricket quiz session where the height of a cricket stump was pegged at 38 cm instead of the universally accepted 28 inches, one could understand the veracity of that famous statement, ‘there’s no gain without pain’. Another revelation to the ignorant mind was that Kapil was named ‘The Wisden Cricketer of the Century’. Given such startling cricket fact inventions, it was a foregone conclusion that the mind would wander away from the quiz into a slumber. But all bad things must come to an end and so did the quiz.

The bank had partnered with Cheeka’s son’s company to organise the event. One has always wondered about the many hats donned by the Chief Selector. Private events organised with a current player, active participation in the CSK team and being the chief selector at the same time, obviously presents many situations of conflicting interests. Everyone seems to be glossing over the fact and one decided to raise this rather pertinent question at some other forum.

Enter Veeru and Srikkanth amid the audience applause. Veeru was looking leaner and fitter than one has ever witnessed. With the entire media contingent present in its full glory, one expected an interesting session of play. Veeru started the proceedings by admitting that he was not exactly a terrific speaker and wished luck to the new product. On his assessment of the impending Indo-Pak match, he came up with the classic, “Whoever plays better on the day, will win today”. Cheeka was his usual bumbling self, making statements like, “Slowly, quite fast we are getting there”.

Having read the Sehwag interview a few days back on Cricinfo, one felt sure, that he would be grilled on his “captaincy” statements and Upton’s lately released dossier. He neatly sidestepped the K-Sutra related questions by saying that he hadn’t received the dossier. On being asked a long question in English, he joked that since he wasn’t very good at English, would the interviewer translate it in Hindi. If ever, a guy’s batting is an extension of his personality, Sehwag will be at the top of that list.

“I don’t change my style of play whether I am playing Tests, T20s or ODIs. If I get a bad ball, I hit it”, familiar words from the dasher. “I don’t have a game plan when I walk into bat. I like to keep my mind blank”, a quote one had read in the Cricinfo interview.

He was hopeful of a come back in the upcoming Champions League and being fully fit for the Australia ODI series. He was categorical in denying the statement accorded to him that he didn’t want the Indian captaincy. His reason for stepping down from the DDD captaincy was that he had captained them for 2 years and they never made it even to the finals. It was more to see if the team’s luck changed under a new captain. This statement was not followed up with the rather logical question about whether he thought that winning a T20 championship was more a matter of the captain’s luck than the captain’s cricketing acumen. That would be an interesting debate, which was missed by the media.

When asked his take on a chaseable total, his reply was, “Anything under 300”. “If Sachin said so, we should go for it”, when asked about his views on SRT’s proposed ODI format.

Srikkanth mentioned that Malcolm Marshall and Wasim Akram were the two bowlers he found difficult. He would not go into naming the youngsters, he thought, who the selection committee found promising. He was asked questions that were directed to him as the head selector, which he wasn’t, at the function. Stalemate it was, indeed.

The audience questions were full tosses.

What was his birth date? Easy pickings for him.

What does he like more? ODIs or T20s?

“I like Test cricket the most”. Touche.  

Greatness comes cheap

One just witnessed the words, Greatness and Dilshan, come together, in some other article on this website, during the just concluded SL / New Zealand ODI series and one decided to take the bull by its horns. TM Dilshan may be a good entertaining player. He may be the origin of the scoop. BUT he is NOT 'great' by any stretch of imagination.

When India visited the Kiwis in early 2009, Jesse Ryder was termed as a 'genius'. One, who could rule the cricketing world. He was declared as one of the most talented guys going around on the circuit. Currently, he is mostly famous for his drunken ways. And his average of 15. The pressure on the media to create a buzz and hype around any success story is immense.

One of the most devalued terms in the sports world today is either 'genius' or 'one of the best ever'. Easy to use, easier to discard.

Take Dilshan. All he has done in his life is flashing. On flat Sri Lankan pitches, that too!!  A lot of people have done it on the England Cricket grounds and caught a few raised eyebrows and a few raunchy claps. A few have tried at Wimbeldon as well to be flooded with the the popular green towels. One poor soul tried to do it in Australia, where he met up with a ramapaging Andrew Symonds.The inherent weakness in flashing is that it's supposed to last for a very short time.

Many words have been wasted in comparing him to Sehwag. To reach that pantheon, he has to score a few more runs against better opposition on more difficult pitches. Till then, one would rather want to place him alongside a K Srikanth more than a Sehwag. Actually K Srikanth can himself be called the pioneer of 'carefree' cricket. Even this comparison can be made with Cheeka, only if one was feeling really generous.

A flash in the pan, Dilshan maybe. One can't say too many things against him today, because he is going through a purple patch and anyone attempting to doubt his 'greatness' will be laughed away as an ignoramus.

Human psychology tends to always go with the trend. Especially in one's business where trend is always one's friend. It's easy because the majority is siding with you when you follow a trend. But big money is made only by standing against the trend. At the right time though.

 So why is Dilshan being hailed as a GREAT or one on the verge of achieving greatness? Inflation may be one answer. A million Dollars today fetch you far less than what a million would fetch you 10 years back. One can't think of any other rationale.

He scored a scintillating century against New Zealand in the latest Test series and he was instantly compared to Sehwag, it seems. On the fast bouncy/swinging Sri Lankan tracks that too. And then he has got an average of 54+ in the last 12 ODIs he has played in the last 12 months. He has scored 3 hundreds in 164 ODIs played till date. In 57 Test matches, he has scored  9 centuries at an average of 43.03. Three out of them coming against Bangladesh, out of 9 matches played against them, at an average of 77.10.

The only point tried to be made here being, 'Great' is a cheap word.  Even a Mark Greatbatch ruled over the cricket field for a few months. Lance Klusener was the ultimate killer machine on a Cricket ground for a year or two. One never hears of them as being geniuses any more. Even Jayasuriya used to score freely in test matches as an opener. So an aggressive opener is not really a novelty in Test cricket any more. And to even match Hayden/ Sehwag/Jayasuriya, Dilshan has a long way to go.

We shall see if Dilshan comes even close to the 'Greatness' tag. My money will be against it.

Formula (No.) 1 for lawn mower fixing

Just on the back of the horrifyingly stale news that Renault asked Nelson Piquet Jr to deliberately bang his car into the some corner of a surprisingly empty Singapore street, has come another disturbing accusation. Match fixing in the world of the equally, if not more, exciting and adrenaline pumping sport of lawn mowing. One will confirm the pulsating details of how all the mowing races were fixed in the due course of time. Everything will be clear like daylight in the fullness of time. Alas, till then the public will have to wait with an air of anticipation.

 

But now that we have the hoary details of the F1 saga one will try and attempt an uncomplicated description of the Alonso-Piquet Jr- Renault case.

The first ever F1 night race to happen in Singapore in 2008 was indeed a dark chapter in the history of F1 racing. L'Affaire Renault shot into the limelight when Nelson Piquet Jr. admitted that he was asked to get his racing car's back side familiar with a part of the Singapore circuit's wall. He was assured that if he didn't exceed a particular speed at the corner, his chances of getting away with only minor injuries were as high as 5%. The maximum speed permissible for a safe manoeuvre of this sort has not been made public as these actions can be performed only by experts.

He was assigned a nice little quiet corner to display his skills. It was a place where the car moving equipment couldn’t bother him for some time. He was also gently reminded that since his racing contract for the year 2009 wasn't as yet finalised, his inaction to act on the team's suggestions would be frowned upon. Nelson Piquet Jr. was piqued by the way he was treated by the Renault team in 2009 and was desperate to pick up a fight. Hence, the surfacing of his accusations, it seems.

Alonso, it seems, was unaware of this plot as it was purely on a need to know basis. And he was filling fuel anyways when this conversation was happening.

But the news that is even more disturbing is surely about this match fixing malady spreading to a contact sport like Lawn mowing (well the mower does touch the grass). Played out there in the genteel lawns of thatched roof houses, with the sun shining benignly down on the players, the sport has for ages been a pastime for the action junkies.

But one has seen enough illustrations of accusations teams losing a match in field hockey to attain a play off position favourable to them. Tennis has had it’s share of David n cos as well. Even in cricket, one remembers South Africa trying to overtake India’s total in the inaugural World T20 at their own pace, to avoid meeting Australia in the semi finals. No proof obviously to make this statement since they promptly went and lost the match and not making it to the semis at all.

So why are people making so much sound and dance about Lawn mowing? It’s become another sport that has been blighted by this omnipresent loathsome disease, that’s why.

 

One needs to tender a tiny apology as it has been brought to one’s notice that the game is actually Lawn Bowling. Big Deal isn’t it?

Wrong'un
 

There once was a man named Warne

whose empire never saw the setting sun

to some he sounded corny

to others it was absolute baloney

when he claimed that the wrong team won.

 

Extending the ODI series results to the quality of your country's test team is a typical audacious effort by Shane Warne. Another wrong'un by the master.

 

 

 

 

Crossing the Line

 The start to the week (in Asia we start early) was all about a tiny line overstepped (in mid air that too, mind you.) and a tennis ball threatened to be rammed down the throat of the woman whose very job was to watch that same line carefully and to maintain the sanctity of that boundary. One of the requirements to be selected for the said woman's rather boring but important and partly glamorous job is to have a perfect T20 vision (natural or corrected). Why glamorous, some may ask. Well, it feels nice and important when Federer comes and enquires after you when his fault serve has hit you in the guts or thereabouts and you lie down there spluttering apologetically for having interrupted the match. There are all those cameras zooming in on your ugly mug which no one cares to glance at. But at that moment a decent percentage of the world population is eyeing you. You may also have a nice story to tell other folks about how Sharapova looked into your perfect T20 vision eyes and apologised profusely for ruining your future generations with her awfully misdirected forehand. The LLU (lady line umpire) in the abovementioned episode actually feared that she would have no story to tell to anyone in the near future so she chose the safe but wise path to report the incident to her superior.

There were two clear groups with one group openly contending the veracity of that line judgement and blaming the tiny lady line umpire for the entire episode that followed. She was called a loser and some Indian bloggers in the group even went to the extent of calling her Tushhar Kapur. She didn’t have the guts to stay there and fight it out, they sniggered. The other group was equally adamant that the behaviour of the leading crossed the line of decency and sportsmanship and it was immaterial whether the foot actually had not touched the line.

 There have been many imaginary lines in geography viz., the equator, the tropic of cancer, the tropic of Capricorn and so on. But these have been of theoretical interest mostly. The more important boundaries in the history of the human race have been those lines dividing nations. Almost all Wars have been fought to resolve the difference of opinion between 2 entities about where that line should be. Hitler thought no line existed between Germany and Russia. Stalin thought it did, and that it existed quite far away from Moscow, quite close to Berlin. That’s how the most important battle in WWII can be put in a really precise perspective.

One such boundary is already rising the heckles of the media with one of India's northern neigbours, the name of which starts with C and ends with an A and no, it is not Canada.But that's for some other post

The last time so much brouhaha was made about a lady crossing a line was in Ramayana when Sita crossed over to the dark side (albeit unknowingly). Alas there was no line umpire there to call her foot fault which would have made the entire war between Ram and Ravana (India and Sri Lanka of the old) redundant. This one moment of sub-line treachery by Ravana led to the "footloose" Sita propaganda machinery that haunted her even after the war and prompted her to return to mother earth.

The modern Ramayana (without the underlying theme of good v/s evil, just India v Sri Lanka) was being enacted on the same day the other ‘foot over the line’ drama. In this contest though, it was a circular boundary line within which the drama was played. The Indians actually managed to win against the Lankans despite testing the viewers’ thin line of patience. The boundary of one’s patience was violated by the Indian fielding so many times that the LOC on the Indo Pak border seemed like an impenetrable wall.

Congratulations team India, for winning the Compaq trophy. The media has something to write about tomorrow.

Congratulations to MS Dhoni to have maintained his batting average. He protects it with such vengeance that the producers of Jhansi ki Rani are planning to cast him in that role or at least get him to dub those immortal lines ‘Mein meri Jhansi nahi doongi’ (I won’t give up my kingdom of Jhansi).

Congrats SRT for the 44th.

Congrats Yusuf for your all round (zero) performance

And Congrats Bhajji for a fifer that will keep you in the lime light for the right reason.

And finally the most important wish. Happy Birthday Robin Singh!! This may be the last you spend with the Indian team. 


Also Ran kings don't matter or do they?

MS Dhoni had a very pertinent and original point of view when he opined that if India did well on the field, the rankings and ratings would take care of themselves. With India poised to take the ICC top ODI ranking, IF they win all the matches at the Compaq Cup, (which incidentally they have failed miserably to achieve. As one types this Angelo-the best all rounder in the world - Matthews has taken 6 wickets and potentially looking at 7), one was searching for the relevance or rather the irrelevance of rankings to sport.

Rankings should come with a disclaimer just like mutual funds ads. "Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks, read the offer document carefully before investing". Similarly Rankings also are subject to the vagaries of a match won here or there, having played more matches with sub par teams, or even because the other contender loses some where else. So unless a player or a team is consistently ranked as the top team, it makes little difference if it's India at the top or South Africa have suddenly become the best ODI team in the world.

Dinara Safina who is the top ranked woman player in the world has never won a Grand Slam. A point that is consistenly brought up by Serena. Safina lost quite miserably at the current US Open 2009. Vijender Singh was the top ranked boxer in his weight category at the World Boxing championships. He was thrashed soundly by his Uzbek opponent in the Semi Final bout. He has done enough in this country to get a few more ads. He has already got the highest domestic sports award so he has nothing more to prove. This country is happy with Semi Final losers.

So MSD was right as usual. Getting results will take care of all ranking related issues. But playing worse ODI cricket than England (and that is some feat to achieve) isn't exactly taking care of India's ODI rankings.

Also Ran(s) kings don't become. 

 

 

The girls with the Big Titles

One was reading the other day about how bookmakers are quoting odds on either of Roger Federer's just born twin daughters winning a grand slam tournament (25 to 1) and Wimbledon (100 to 1) by the time they reach their 26th birth day. One just wondered what odds would be quoted around 20 years back on a set of sisters growing up in the tough LA suburb of Compton win more than a handful of grand slam titles between them. Surely the odds would be far higher than the ones mentioned earlier.

Serena and Venus Williams, some how, were never one's favourites because they some how had changed the game of Tennis into something to do with an incredible bludgeoning of the tennis ball punctuated with guttural grunts. Insinuations of sticking to the letter of the law but not the spirit of the law (injury breaks at opportune moments in a match) took some sheen off Serena's achievements. The overbearing personality of their father was a sore point and their extremely glamorous life style seemed at odds with the more muted lives of other Tennis stars. It was obviously only about perception.

But some how the sheer weight of their performance, the realisation that they have now become older and more mature in this game where players are getting younger by the day and the way Serena, especially, came back from a long slump has brought about a drastic change in one's perception.  Women Tennis Players may be getting an equal prize money in today's world, but given the kind of press coverage of the top Men players, the achievements of the Williams' sisters seem to be underplayed.

One came across this brilliant piece written by Simon Hattenstone in The Guardian before the US Open 2009, which is published in full (fearing any distortion to the link at a later date) below. It's an interview with Serena and obviously things are described from her persepctive. But it's a fascniating one. Enjoy!!

 

Two years ago, Serena Williams let out a mighty yelp. She was playing in the Australian Open, she was slow, overweight, and had sunk to 81 in the world rankings. And she'd just about had enough. At that moment it was impossible to know whether she'd had enough of success or of failing.

The yelp proved to be a turning point. Match by match, she remade herself. She slapped her thighs, swore at herself, and forced herself on. Astonishingly, she reached the final to play the in-form Maria Sharapova. So that was that. After all, she'd played hardly any match tennis for two years, and you couldn't win a major on willpower alone. The former Wimbledon champion Pat Cash had called her "deluded" when she said she planned to be number one again.

Williams did not simply beat Sharapova that day, she annihilated her. It was one of the most unlikely victories the sport has seen. By the end, the woman who could barely stretch for a ball in her first match was lithe, fast, subtle and brutal.

After the match, she rolled on her back, legs kicking in the air like a puppy. She bowed and blew kisses, mouthed, "Oh my God!" and whooped and whooped and whooped again. Then she made a thank you speech that said everything you needed to know about the rise and fall of Serena Jameka Williams. "I would like to dedicate this win to my sister, who's not here. Her name is Yetunde. I just love her so much... So thanks, Tunde," she said, before breaking down in tears. Tunde, her eldest sister, was killed in a drive-by shooting in Compton, LA, in 2003.

If Serena wins the US Open, which starts on Monday, she will regain her world number one spot. Even if she doesn't, she will have made the most remarkable comeback. In 2003, she became only the fifth woman in history to win the grand slam (simultaneously to hold all four majors). Today, she has reclaimed three of them – winning the US Open last year and the 2009 Australian Open and Wimbledon titles, and for good measure taking the doubles in Melbourne and London with her sister for the second successive year.

It is an extraordinary story, but not one that comes on its own. It is also the story of her sister, Venus, and of the whole Williams clan, and it belongs as much to myth and marketing as to fact. Their father, Richard Williams, started telling it when his girls were tiny: how years ago he had read that top tennis players could earn a fortune and told his wife Oracene that they would have two daughters who would dominate the sport; how he and Oracene, both Jehovah's Witnesses, taught themselves a game alien to most people in the tough LA suburb of Compton; how he sent out press releases telling local papers that his God-fearing girls had to duck on the courts to avoid bullets from the gangs; how he withdrew the girls from school and junior tennis tournaments, taught them at home, and only allowed them to practise against adults till they were old enough to play them for real; how he gave up his job in a security firm to coach them full time; and how his audacious dream came true: at 17, Venus reached the final of the US Open at her first attempt, and two years later, Serena, also 17, won it.

It's also a story of love and rivalry – Venus and Serena live together in Florida, are best friends and the mightiest of rivals. Although Venus has won Wimbledon more times (five compared with three), Serena holds more majors (11 to seven). The Williams are the most successful sisters in the history of sport. Only six women have won more major singles titles than Serena. This from a girl who was written off as being too small as a young girl and too big as a woman. She's still only 27.

"Actually, I like to tell people I'm 26," she says. "And if I was on the street, I'd say 25." She giggles. She often giggles. We meet in Cincinnati, a city on the Ohio-Kentucky border that has seen better days. The sisters are here to play in a tournament as part of their build-up to the US Open.

Serena arrives in the lobby. She looks around her, a little lost. "Hi, I'm Serena," she says. She sounds shy. She's tall, 5ft 10in, with a big, beautiful face. Her feet are huge. I can't take my eyes of them.

The Williams sisters reinvented the women's game by playing the brutal power tennis associated with men. Venus has recorded the fastest woman's serve in history, while Serena batters opponents into submission. She is an unlikely mix of sex kitten and playground bully, turning up in outré outfits (black Lycra catsuit, white leather trench coat, denim mini-skirt and knee-high boots) and forcing the opposition from corner to corner of the court, until they collapse exhausted. There is no greater sight in tennis than Serena going to work. She glares at the ball, her bottom swinging like a metronome, her muscles bright as her earrings. The way she destroys players verges on the sadistic – slow strangulation rather than the quick bullet to the head Venus delivers. Tunde used to say, "You beat that girl like she stole something. What did she steal of yours?"

We're sitting on a bench in front of the hotel. An SUV passes, and Serena eyes it enviously. "I wanna get a new car, but I'm not used to spending money." You're tight? "I'm tight, yeah," she says in her best Mockney. "I'm so frugal, you wouldn't believe it." Why? "Growing up, my Mom and Dad were so much, 'Don't be like the average athlete, and have all this money and spend it all.' And I always like to want something. I don't want to have everything." She's tossing up the pros and cons of a new car, and hits on a solution: "I'm not going to buy a new car until I win something."

But it's barely a month since she won Wimbledon. "I know! And I didn't treat myself then."

"D'you want something small, or a flash car?"

"Yeah small, like an SUV." She giggles. "Well, you know, everyone has an SUV these days."

Serena took away more than £1m for winning the singles and doubles, upping her career earnings to over $25m. Her sponsorship deal with Nike is worth $40m. Then there's the acting career (she has appeared in ER and Law & Order); the fashion range (called Aneres, Serena backwards); the school she has opened in Africa; the screenplay she has written; and now her autobiography. She says it was important for her to give an honest account of her life because, since Tunde's death, she has not been as open as she should have been. "It opened up a lot of doors I left closed to the public and to myself."

There are so many misconceptions about her and the family, she says, and she wanted to put them right. "People see me on the court only as a superhero, grunting and winning. They think you're a robot and I'm not."

Serena grew up in a poor family rich in love, faith and ambition. Richard told his daughters they had to write out their dreams. "He'd say if you fail to plan, you're planning to fail." The five daughters (two from Oracene's first marriage) slept in the one bedroom, and Serena, the youngest, curled up with a different sister every night because there were only four beds. She was closest to Venus, just a year older. She adored her, was in awe of her, jealous of her, wanted everything she had and more.

"If we were in a restaurant, my dad would make me order first because I'd always order what Venus ordered. I still do it. He wanted me to have a mind of my own." Even that didn't work. "When she ordered, I'd change my mind and get the same thing." If Venus had been a mathematician, she says, she probably would have been, too.

Didn't it annoy Venus? No, she says, nothing does. "On court she doesn't get angry, doesn't crack rackets like some of us do. She's so relaxed. If I beat her, she isn't angry."

You should have swapped names, I say. She grins. "I know, I'm so not serene." When Serena was eight, she played in her first tournament and was beaten by Venus in the final. Venus won a gold cup, and Serena was devastated she had to make do with the silver. Venus told her she preferred silver to gold and they swapped trophies. It's the only trophy she still keeps by her bedside, she says.

Did you want to be Venus? "Yes. She was perfect, she was thin, she always got straight As, everything came so easy for her. I did everything I could to be Venus. I felt like the ugly duckling."

Oh, come off it! She sneezes, then snorts her snot back up her nose. "Phfffffffffff. Well, thanks but... I got my butta face on today."

Your what? "My butta face – everything looks good butta my face. Hahahaha! I have a good excuse. I don't feel well." She's worried she's coming down with flu. 

Little sister syndrome, she says, spurred her on. When they were growing up, the press showed an interest, but they didn't believe there could be two champions in the one family, whatever Richard Williams told them. So they'd interview Venus, and Serena would tag along, but there was rarely space for the both of them in the articles. The funny thing is, she says, they were right, in a way. She wasn't that good a player back then – she was tiny, and all she could hit were dainty lobs.

A few years ago, when they were established as the two best players in the women's game, Venus said they should study fashion. "When she forced me to go to college, we'd take the same class and she'd always do better. It was like, earggggh!" Her scream of frustration is every bit as loud as the on-court grunt. She lets one more go for good measure. "Earggggh! Why you always better than me? If I had two kids of the same sex, I don't think I'd put them in the same sport or same thing. I obviously won't be as hard on my kids – just because the times have changed."

She stops. Look, she says, her parents were strict, but they were fair, always gave them the choice. And, she stresses, her mother was just as involved in the tennis as her father.

Serena says the biggest misconception is about her father, but accepts that he's partly responsible for it. "My dad is the nicest guy you'll ever meet, and the easiest going." The assumption that they were bullied into the game is simply not true. "My dad really is a genius to get me and my sister in tennis. Not only that, but he negotiated Venus's first contract, which was the biggest female contract ever signed. That was pure genius. He did my contract with Puma, and that was genius. My dad is a marketing mastermind." By the time Serena was nine, Richard had raised enough money from sponsors to move the family to the safer and more tennis-friendly Florida.

She thinks people tend to criticise rather than credit him for his achievement, and she doesn't understand why. "When, at Wimbledon, he was jumping up and down, I would have done the same thing if two of my kids were in the final. My dad was born in Lousiana – segregation, racism galore – and he goes from that into producing not one but two champions. And then they think he's tough. And that's not him at all."

She says I'd be surprised if I met him. A few minutes later I do – and I am.

It's the first time they've seen each other in Cincinnati. He speaks to her with great tenderness.

"How are ya, darling? I love you baby."

"I love you, too, Daddy.".

Venus and Serena developed a reputation for being remote. Despite their success, they were not truly loved by America. At Indian Wells in 2001, after Venus pulled out of the semi-final against her sister because of injury, the whole family was booed when Serena played the final. Neither sister has played Indian Wells since.

Serena says they have kept to themselves for a number of reasons. "I think it was the race, the Jehovah's Witness and just not joining in with other people. The Bible says a bad association spoils useful habits. Also, when I first came on the tour, I'd see Steffi Graff, Monica Seles, Pete Sampras, observe them, and you didn't see them with everyone else. So immediately I was like, I'm going to be like that. The people who are working to be the greatest have this extra focus. And I have a sister on tour who I'm best friends with."

It's only recently that she realised she had a reputation for being tough. "I was playing team tennis and this girl was, like, 'I can't believe how nice you are, you're so cool, and I heard you were super mean.'" She thinks it's funny. "It's fine. Let them keep thinking I'm mean."

Before every match she writes herself Post-it notes and attaches them to her racket cover. They range from statements about the power of self-belief, God and African-American history, to reminders to bend her knees and not to hit so hard, to simple statements of fact mixed with pseudo logic (you have won more majors than Venus, therefore you will beat her).

She was only 20 when she won the grand slam – the ultimate achievement in tennis. The other day they showed a Classic Williams Week on television and Serena couldn't quite believe the early years. "You see me playing Venus in 99, and the commentator was, like, 'Serena Williams, I really like her second serve, she's going to be a good player.' It was so surreal. And that year I ended up winning the US Open. I was on the way to greatness, and you could see the way I was hitting and everything about me was just super cool."

Her fall was every bit as dramatic as her rise. After Tunde died, Serena won only one major tournament in four years. She suffered horrendous knee injuries, and appeared more interested in Hollywood and fashion than in tennis.

In May 2006, Chris Evert wrote an open letter to Serena in Tennis magazine, saying that she could be the greatest woman player and she was betraying her talent. Two months later, Serena was ranked 140th in the world. Martina Navratilova also criticised her for squandering her gift.

She never responded to the attacks. "I thought she was entitled to her opinion," Serena says with deliberation. But the onslaught devastated her. "Before, I didn't really talk about other people, and since then I've done it less, because you don't know what's going on behind closed doors."

She says the barrier was set higher for her and Venus. "It has never been said about Justine Henin or Kim Clijsters or Martina Hingis, and those other girls who dropped by the wayside. Maybe they thought I had more talent." This seems to be why she has written her memoirs: to put the record straight. While she told the press that she was injured, and much of the time she was, she was also beset by depression. She says there was the initial shock of Tunde's death, then a delayed reaction. "It was a very difficult time in my life." She blinks, and apologises. "I still get teary-eyed talking about it."

Yetunde Price, who worked as the personal assistant to Venus and Serena, was 31 when she died. She was a registered nurse, and had had three children with an LA gang member when she was young. She left him, and moved into a nice house in a safer area. But she never quite transcended her background. Shortly before she died, she took up with another gang member, who was driving the car in which she was killed. The bullets had been meant for him.

The night she died, her mother phoned Serena at 3am to say she couldn't get hold of Tunde and she was worried. Serena told her that she was sure everything was fine and she was probably asleep. "But I have this sick sixth sense, which I hate, and it wouldn't leave me alone. I called her house, and a lady answered screaming and crying. And I had to tell my mom and everyone. My sister Lyn was with me, and I had to tell her and she lost it. So I had to be the strong one." Worst of all, she had to tell Tunde's children.

For a while she played on, acted as if nothing was wrong, and then she lost it.

"I didn't leave my house for weeks. I didn't talk to anybody. It was hard on my sisters, because when you're used to talking to somebody every day and you just don't talk to them, and they want to help you but you don't want to accept help... It's not easy." The only trips she made were to Stan's Donuts for comfort food. She became bigger and bigger.

Did she realise she was having a breakdown?

"No," she says. "If I did, I don't think it would have been a breakdown. When you have a breakdown, it's about denial. It was for me."

Gradually she clawed her way back. Three factors helped her, she says. First, she saw a therapist. Second, she went to Africa to search out her family's roots, and opened a school in Kenya, which felt better than any tennis triumph. She visited the slave castles, which put her problems into perspective. She told herself that if previous generations had survived the terrible sea journey to America and then slavery, she could survive this. And finally, there was Australia, the yelp of anguish, and the promise she made to herself that she wouldn't be beaten. Before the final, her motivational Post-it notes simply said "Tunde". Victory was almost an exorcism.

Tunde's death also put tennis into context. She had always known it was just a game (in 1997, Richard Williams told the New York Times he hoped his daughters would be done with tennis by 23/24, because "I don't want a couple of gum-chewing illiterates on my hands") and this reaffirmed it. "There is more to life than hitting a ball over a net into a box," she says.

Now the important thing was to work out if it was a game she still wanted to play. "All my life I'd woken up to tennis, tennis, tennis. Even if I don't go to practise, I'm thinking about it all day. And to have it on your mind for 24 years is a long time. So that's what I was questioning. Is this something I really love. Is it something my dad wanted me to do? Is it something I'm doing cos Venus is doing it?" She concluded that her absence had rekindled her passion for tennis, and decided to live by a simple rule. When she fell out of love with the game, she'd quit. When she didn't fancy a tournament, she wouldn't play. But whenever she did compete, she'd give her all.

Look at Cincinnati, she says, there's nothing to do here, it's not her kind of place, but she's happy to be here. She flashes her yellow fingernails at me. "I've got my nails done, I'm ready." Her toenails have also been painted yellow for the occasion. I'm still staring at her feet.

Can I ask a personal question?

"Uhum. Maybe."

What size shoes do you wear.

"Size 10." Venus takes an 11.

She looks so much fitter than she did a couple of years ago. I ask how much she weighed at the Australian Open in 2007. She grins. "You mean when I was super-thick?" Pardon? "You heard me, Moooooo! How did I move so fast? I haven't stepped on the scale in about 15 years. If I step on a scale, I won't eat for five months."

After Tunde died, she found her faith challenged. "When you don't go to your Christian meetings, it takes its toll. I wasn't going because I never left my house and instead of taking comfort in what I should have done, which is reading Bible scriptures, I didn't. But I learned that I could help others to say this isn't the right way. How do I know? Because I've experienced it."

Now, she says, she's ready to go out and spread the word. "I want to knock on people's doors and preach. But I also meet a lot of people on planes and in restaurants, and you can preach with them or place some literature with them. In a discreet way? "A discreet but honest way. We're dealing with serious concerns like what is the world coming to? Everything is going downhill in terms of the economy, and the green stuff. What's going to happen to this world? In the Bible it talks about how God's going to restore the world to a paradise, and God is someone who keeps his promises, Jehovah says he would never destroy this world, so if you believe in the Bible, those things are comforting to know."

It's amazing how easily she slips between the dizzy and the God bothering. As a Jehovah's Witness, she explains, she doesn't celebrate birthdays or Christmas, and is not allowed to vote. Why not? "Are you familiar with the Bible?" "Not as much as I should be," I say. "It's fine, it's awesome, you can always learn. So we don't get involved in politics. Christ said I am no part of this world, so we're trying to be Christ-like and follow his example by being no part of this world."

We're flicking through pictures of her friends. She becomes surprisingly coy when I ask if she is dating the rapper Common. "I may or may not be." Is he Mr Right? She ums and ahs, and says she hopes so because she doesn't fancy starting again from scratch. Are you living with Common? She looks shocked. "Oh no, I don't live with people unless I'm married."

She's not sure who she will marry, but she knows the date. "I'm getting married on my sister's birthday. Tunde's. I thought that would be a nice day."

Tunde is at the heart of much of her conversation.

She's flicking through more photos on her phone when she comes to a couple of cute dogs. Who are they? "Ah, that's Jackie, and that's Laurelai. They're here." She taps a bag at her side, and out jump two tiny dogs – a jack russell and Maltese terrier. "They've been napping. Laurelai be nice. You're so cute. Imisshyou, Iloveyousomuch, you're so cute. OK, Grandpa's gonna walk you. Momma loves you, girl." "Do you always talk baby language to Laurelai?" "She's not very smart," she whispers. "This is the smart one."

Now her voice is mature. "This is Jackie. Hello Jackie. Girls, get in your bag till Momma can watch you."

How old are they? "I lie about their age as well. Jackie I'll say is seven."

Actually, she has had Jackie since she first won the US Open 10 years ago. The sun is going down, but it's still hot. An SUV passes. Sascha, with whom she practises, puts his head out of the window. "Are you hungry? We want to go to China City Buffet." "Who's we? Where's V?" "V's just parked right there," Sascha says. "Is Harold with her? I gotta say hi to Harry." Harry is Venus's dog. The three dogs live with the girls in Florida. "Is Venus going to China City?" "I don't know." "Well, if V goes, I'll go."

As they drive off, she bursts out laughing. "Oh gosh. Ahahahaha. Oh no! 'I'll wait to see if she goes.' I just keep doing it!" Just as she's telling me how she used to be a punk rocker, and how she's obsessed with the band Green Day (she has bought five of their guitars on eBay), another SUV rolls up. This one contains Venus and her team. Serena flaps with excitement and runs to the car. Heyyyyyyyyyy! Hey, Harold. Ah miss ma Harryyyyyyyyyyy!"

Venus serenely shakes my hand and says hello. I ask Serena if she regards herself as an extrovert or shy. "Both. I'm a real extrovert, but when I'm round someone new, I'm super shy." She knows something doesn't ring quite true. "Actually, I'm lying. The older I get, the more extroverted I get. I'm super extroverted."

After beating Venus at Wimbledon, she gave an interview in a T-shirt that read "Are You Looking At My Titles" across her chest. Was that one of her designs? "No, it's a Nike shirt.

It is because I have big titles." She giggles. "I have really big titles!"

She got the giggles again when she was reminded that Dinara Safina, who has yet to win a grand slam tournament, was the world's number one. Serena didn't say so explicitly, but she obviously thought the ranking system ludicrous. So you took the piss out of her? "Well, I mean, hello! I'm not going to say anything mean, but she said she won in Madrid and Rome so deserves to be number one, and I was just thinking to myself, you keep your Spain and Italy, I'm going to go ahead and keep my slams. I just laughed."

Now she is desperate to retain the US Open and officially re-establish herself as the world's number one. As for her legacy, she'd like to be remembered as the tennis player who opened doors. She tells me she's opening another school in Africa and quotes one of her heroes. "There's a saying in Spiderman, 'To those whom much is given much is expected in return'. That's what his grandfather told him. Actually, it is in the Bible as well, but it was said different in the Bible." But surely it's important for her to be remembered as a better player than Venus? "Honest? Jackie get in the bag, girl. Obviously I want to win more than her, but we count them together." So will they be remembered together as a team? "I think so. I hope so. How else can we be remembered? To be a part of that is super cool. I mean, we're the Williams sisters, you know."

Lucky number Seven

 The number 7 is many things to many different people. When one hears of seven one is reminded of the following:

Seven Wonders of the World

Seven Seas

Seven Continents

Seven Promises and Seven rounds in a Hindu Wedding (Saptapadi)

Seven Swaras in Indian music (Sapta Swaras)

The Seven Samurai

The only number in the first ten digits to not have a divisibility rule (Is a number divisible by 'x', for e.g. if you add up all digits of a number and that addition is divisible by 3, then that number is divisible by 3). This fact was discovered while studying for CAT.

The Seven stars (Saptarshi)

The Seven year itch

The Seven deadly sins (automatically the movie Se7en comes to mind as well)

Lord Voldemort split his soul into Seven parts

Seven heavens in Islam

The Seven Chakras

Seven days in a week

Seven Liberal Arts

All mammals' and brids' necks have Seven bones (with very few exceptions)

Seven colours of a Rainbow

the denominator in Pi

Seven Hills of Rome

Beckham's jersey number at Manchester United

Seven brides for Seven brothers

The Secret Seven by Enid Blyton

James Bond (007)

777 the number of God.

The list is not complete but one hopes to have put the point across about the many facets of the number 7. 

But the reference to the magic number that will flash the brightest in one's mind will surely be the one featured in the Syrian Football coach, Fajer Ebrahim's statement before the finals of the Nehru trophy 2009 at Delhi against India.

He said, "I just need to field Seven players to take India out. They are a very easy team now. This time around they are very slow and lack in skills. I am pretty confident of taking the trophy home this year."

It seemed in the mould of Steve Waugh's 'mental disintegration' strategy. He later tried to pass it off as a joke. Little was he to know that the the 'joke' would be firmly on him just like it was on Glen McGrath's 5-0 prediction.

India beat Syria for the title 6-5 in a penalty shoot out. In an interview in a daily, Indian midfielder Steven Dias said that these comments fired up the Indians and were instrumental in them winning. Ironically the number of penalty kicks needed to decide the champion was... you guessed it.. Seven.The Indian goalkeeper, who was the man of the match is named Subrata (7 letters again Smile).

Seven Eleven is one store that Ebrahim maynot visit in the near future.