in Search

USA Cricketer

Five ways to make cricket attractive to Americans - Ian Pont

By Ian Pont
 
(Third in a series of opinion pieces.  Click here for first and second.  If you would like to contribute to this series, please email content@dreamcricket.com.)
 
Having played and coached in the professional English cricket system, it’s always a challenge to work in an associates’ system that is lacking in both funding and a professional outlet. After 3 years as Assistant Head Coach with the Dutch national team to successfully qualify for the 2007 ICC World Cup, I have seen there are many factors that can genuinely help develop cricket. And now, with 3 coaching visits under my belt to the US plus numerous conversations with officials and those involved with playing and coaching, I see far more clearly how the US can help itself.
 
1.     Stop The Politics
 
In any walk of life people are out to make a name for themselves, But when it comes to developing a sport, a far bigger picture is important. More than making speeches, it’s useful for officials and those involved with the game to actually DO things to bring young players through. Initially, it may mean losing cricket matches at various levels whilst people learn how to win. You will often find managers and coaches of teams just wanting to get their own personal record as good as possible and not think about how they can bring talent through. The game is all about being fair, reasonable and player focused. It’s never about administrators and coaches records even though they like to think it is.
 
2.     Develop Players Correctly
 
Get a development plan, stick to it and see it through. The only way any country can make a sport attractive is to develop those who already play first, so the national teams that represent that country actually perform well. No media wants to cover a ‘minority’ sport where its teams are not playing at the highest levels. Or worse still when they do, they are heavily beaten. It would be madness to imagine that others are attracted to a sport where there’s no success, outlet for success, nor the opportunity to take the game up further after a young age other than for recreation. If cricket in the US is merely for recreation, it’s competing with activities that take far less time out of a day.
 
3.     Coach Cricket Professionally By Developing 'Professional' Coaches
 
It’s worrying to note that so few high level coaches (or any recognised level coaches) work in the US or are involved with cricket in the US. It simply means that talent lies wasted, unfulfilled. The best players require the best coaching, or at least specialised coaching from experts who know how to maximise talent. And beginners deserve the chance of access to the best advice. Parents are keen to help but there’s a massive lack of coaching knowledge. A coach education program with an awareness of what’s required to bring lads through is vital.  I have been lucky to coach at first-class and international level with players such as Andy Flower, Darren Gough, Dale Steyn and Shoaib Akthar, but most of my time is concentrated on Under 19’s now because this is where the most good can be done. For US to move forward, it must have coaches that can teach the professional aspects of the game – and on a regular basis - with a professional attitude to cricket.
 
4.     Spend Money On Grass Pitches
 
As understandable as it is, playing on matting pitches does not help the US with its cricket. Yes if it’s all that’s available to get a game played then fine. Every region of the US should have at least a couple of grass pitches and funding for this must be made a priority. The US must seek to have two or three pitches that would be suitable for ODI’s. This means the US could host matches from larger countries. Most of the players coming through cricket in the US have little concept of how to build an innings due to the nature of the surfaces they play on and the type of cricket they play. It’s only when players travel to Test playing countries they realise just how different real turf pitches play. And however good a US player is, if he has played only on matting then he has little chance of adapting.
 
5.     Look At Your Neighbours
 
Canada has shown the way. I was fortunate to go to Toronto with England Under 19’s as a player in 1979 to play in what was the forerunner to the current Under 19’s world cup. We played on turf pitches at Upper Canada College and it was a delight. Canadian cricket has done the four ‘must do’s’ listed above and continued with that over this entire time.  And whilst Canadian cricket rises and falls dependent on the cycle of players, they have embraced some of the ‘professionalism’ required in attitude to develop the sport on a limited budget. Canada appointed the best available national coach for their ICC 2007 World Cup (former England Under 19’s manager and friend of mine Andy Pick, who is now ICC Associates Director for the Americas) to work for 3 years at the highest level and scout for and develop players within the system. Even on smaller budgets, there was real progress made. There’s an Associates’ success story in place on the US doorstep that would be worth mimicking, or at least reviewing and adapting.
 
My fear for the US is that the clock has been ticking a long while now. The rest of the world is expecting the US to step up and make cricket a viable option as far smaller countries like Afghanistan, Ireland, Kenya and Canada have done. The lure of the lucre from T20 cricket is lip-smacking. So the prize is a huge one. But it’s the longevity of cricket, which is important as much as instant success on the field. It’s a careful balancing act. What little money is available has to be put into cricket resources. And like any investment, it’s a calculated investment and not a huge gamble that’s required.
 
The urgent always overtakes the important. I just hope that the US can think about what’s important.
 
[The author is Founding Partner, Mavericks Cricket Institute (MCI) in UK and is the founder of ABSAT Coaching Methods.  He has written two books on coaching - The Fast Bowler's Bible and Coaching Youth Cricket. Ian has made three coaching visits to the US in the last two years coaching on behalf of DreamCricket Academy.]

 

Published Jan 18 2010, 06:38 PM
Filed under: ,

Comments

 

roger said:

On point 4 (grass pitches), I assumed that Ian was saying there must be at least 2 grass pitches per region. That makes about 14 grass pitches as a minimum. He is not saying every league should play on them, but players who reach the top levels of cricket in the USA must be comfortable playing on them.

How can USA send teams like the under 19 team to New Zealand for the current world cup and expect them to compete on surfaces that are totally different to what they are used to? It is little wonder they struggle against teams from the top countries where the majority of their players play most of their cricket on grass pitches.

I just wonder how much it actually costs to develop and maintain these pitches. Is it the problem of cricket getting sole use of an oval of grass? Or is it the cost of maintaining the surface? Some investment must be made, but the cost will determine how many grass pitches are developed and maintained.

January 20, 2010 2:48 AM
 

robinu said:

Good serious, but respectful discussion. Let me put my thoughts across. Let us concentrate on much disdained cricket playing expat community in USA.

Mostly comprised of Indians, Pakistanis, Bangaladeshis, Carribeans and minor contributions from other major cricket playing nations (UK, SA, AUS, NZ). At the last count this there were about 2.5 million South Asians and about half that for the rest combined = 4 million.

Population of NZ = 4 million

Population of Aus= 17 mil

These countries are more than competetive with countries as large as India (1.1 bil+)

So even if half of that number tune into a TV broadcast the TV ratings would be around 8.0, same number as that for the latest BCS bowl game (source SI.com). So there is a solid business and financial potential in this community. Lalit Modi is not dumb, to think of USA as next destination for IPL.

Now we do not have any trouble in our communities to raise money to build and run cultural and religious institiutions, to impart and maintain culture of our motherlands to the next generation. Some of these organizations have raised, more than $10 million. So it is not impossible to raise the money and build the facilities which will help transfer our passion (cricket) to our kids. Whether the native born white americans will take up the sport or not, our kids (white,black, asians or south asians) are also americans, and I will be very proud to give them the best opportunity, to succeed in anything they do and enjoy and be proud of their endeavours.

If the cricket has to seep into local communities and schools, first it has to have financial strength to support the induction of sport in schools and colleges. So there are many things that have to happen. May be it is a long road, but one has to start somewhere.

January 21, 2010 6:55 PM
 

robinu said:

Good serious, but respectful discussion. Let me put my thoughts across. Let us concentrate on much disdained cricket playing expat community in USA.

Mostly comprised of Indians, Pakistanis, Bangaladeshis, Carribeans and minor contributions from other major cricket playing nations (UK, SA, AUS, NZ). At the last count this there were about 2.5 million South Asians and about half that for the rest combined = 4 million.

Population of NZ = 4 million

Population of Aus= 17 mil

These countries are more than competetive with countries as large as India (1.1 bil+)

So even if half of that number tune into a TV broadcast the TV ratings would be around 8.0, same number as that for the latest BCS bowl game (source SI.com). So there is a solid business and financial potential in this community. Lalit Modi is not dumb, to think of USA as next destination for IPL.

Now we do not have any trouble in our communities to raise money to build and run cultural and religious institiutions, to impart and maintain culture of our motherlands to the next generation. Some of these organizations have raised, more than $10 million. So it is not impossible to raise the money and build the facilities which will help transfer our passion (cricket) to our kids. Whether the native born white americans will take up the sport or not, our kids (white,black, asians or south asians) are also americans, and I will be very proud to give them the best opportunity, to succeed in anything they do and enjoy and be proud of their endeavours.

If the cricket has to seep into local communities and schools, first it has to have financial strength to support the induction of sport in schools and colleges. So there are many things that have to happen. May be it is a long road, but one has to start somewhere.

January 21, 2010 6:55 PM
 

roger said:

Timmyj, It is so refreshing to read your comments here. For a while, it seemed as if all you could do was write negative comments, saying things were destined to fail. Here you have provided some positive, constructive criticism.

I would agree with you that you need to modify the rules when teaching cricket to newcomers. This is regardless of where they come from. In Australia, we don't expect children to play test matches. We don't even expect them to play T20 or any other official version of the game. When they start out, they play kids rules, whatever that may be. When I was at school, I never touched a real cricket ball.

We played continuous cricket which was designed to have maximum involvement by all players. There were 4 bowlers bowling at 1 wicket (a garbage bin). If you picture a baseball diamond, the bowlers would bowl from the 4 bases, and the batsman would stand on the pitcher's mound. The batsman needed to run whenever he or she hit the ball, running to one of the bases and back again. The ball would be thrown to any one of the 4 bases for the next ball to be bowled, whether the batsman was ready or not. The batsman would be out if caught or bowled.  As you could imagine, you never lasted very long while batting. There was lots of running, throwing and shouting, and lots of fun.

Nowadays, I think kids in Australia play different games but the fun is still there. The important thing is not the technical rules of international cricket. The important thing is to get the kids having fun. From there, they can move on to playing the proper game as skills improve.

January 31, 2010 2:31 PM
 

roger said:

Is your figure of $250,000 correct? Wow, I had no idea it could cost anything like that!

If so, you want 100 x $250,000 every 3 to 5 years? So that would take about $100,000,000 to set up? If I had $100 million to spend on cricket in the USA, I'm pretty sure I could buy a fair bit of interest from mainstream USA...

February 3, 2010 2:10 PM
 

RE_3J said:

In my opinion, cricket is always going to be a myth among Americans until ESPN snatches the license away from Direct/Dish and shows actual ICC tournaments and IPL  

No American is going to pay 300$ to DirecTV for cricket when they don't pay half as much for the Superbowl. But when cricket is available for free, the young will watch it and enjoy :

www.gamefaqs.com/.../genmessage.php

Find me another cricket topic on that message board.....

See my point? :)

May 1, 2010 8:28 PM

DreamCricket strongly disapproves of spam and we appreciate your taking the time to report this abuse to us so we can remove it accordingly. If you find any content or comments to be inappropriate, abusive or infringing other people's copyright please report it. To report abuse, please email us at content@dreamcricket.com.

This Blog

Syndication

Tags