Now, you can get all the USA Cricket updates via Facebook. Also follow us on Twitter via @dreamcricket
By Jamie Harrison
I’m finally reading Tom Melville’s classic, The Tented Field: A History of Cricket in America.
My primary motivation is my natural curiosity, plus a need to be
educated about cricket history. As I read, however, I’m finding
important lessons in cricket’s 19th century demise that are instructive
for those of us promoting the game in the 21st.
In the 1800s, as today, cricket had competition from other American
sports, primarily baseball. Cricket entered this “Battle of the
Pastimes” with a number of advantages, not the least of which was the
fact that it had a hundred year history in America, whereas its
challengers had only really emerged in the early decades of the
century. Cricket also had formalized rules, established organizations
and traditional rivalries. It even had the benefit of providing the
United States’ first international competitions.
So, if cricket enjoyed such advantages, why, within just a few
decades, was it so emphatically displaced by baseball as the national
pastime? In the parlance of our game, cricket “put down a sitter” by
seeking too hard to maintain the sport’s exclusivity and prestige, at a
time when Americans were starting to look for a game that could be
played by “everyman.”
Whereas cricket’s insistence on rigid adherence to its laws and
recent competitive developments (such as overhand bowling) made it a
difficult game for novices to enjoy, baseball’s flexible rules at the
time (underhand pitching to promote balls being put in play, outs being
given for catches on one bounce) encouraged new players to “give it a
Lesson: If you want universal adoption of your sport, make it easy for newbies to play and enjoy.
2011 Application: If we want novice Americans to adopt cricket,
we must create forms of the game that allow them to play it (for fun
and recreation) at little cost and with no training whatsoever.
How can we do this? Easy. Organizing adult cricket leagues with
simplified rules, and modifications that encourage the newcomer, such
as inexpensive equipment, soft balls and (gasp) underhand tossing,
rather than bowling. Existing cricket fans will no doubt have to seed
these early leagues, so that the “uncricketed” can see how much fun our
game is to play. (By the way, this is the version of the game that
USYCA delivers to American schools.)
Another element that hurt cricket in the 19th century was its almost
total dependence on expatriate Englishmen and some of their insistence
on the maintaining of class distinctions. These issues tended to put
off most Americans, some of whom came to regard cricket as antithetical
to American identity. Baseball, by comparison, looked far more
democratic and class-blind.
Lesson: To the extent that cricket
organizations appear to be open and welcoming to the community at
large, these organizations will attract the interest and support of
2011 Application: If our sport is to grow in America, cricket
clubs, leagues, associations and governing bodies have an obligation to
create an open and welcoming environment. Public relations, effective
communications and a community-friendly image are all necessary if
cricket is to succeed in America.
So really, the question that faces us is the same one that faced the
cricket establishment in 1848: “Do we want cricket to be “everyman’s”
game, or the exclusive province of a select fraternity?”
The way in
which we choose to answer this question will ultimately determine which
path we choose.