in Search

USA Cricketer

USA Cricket: USACA GM says Central West opted out as host of Twenty20 Nationals

Now, you can get all the USA Cricket updates via Facebook.   Also follow us on Twitter via @dreamcricket

By Peter Della Penna

USA Cricket Association General Manager Manaf Mohamed has disputed the claim that the Central West did not know the USACA Twenty20 national tournament was removed from Dallas until after a report was published on Dreamcricket.com Wednesday night. According to Mohamed, the Central West “recused themselves” from hosting the tournament on May 18 in an email sent by Tournament Director Ramesh Thyagarajan, joint secretary of the North Texas Cricket Association.

“While we would have loved to hold the first national Twenty20 in Dallas, our ability to conduct a seamless, classy tournament without sufficient time to plan organize and execute, and without the approved budget and funds, would be seriously hampered,” were the words written in a May 18 email by Thyagarajan, according to Mohamed. Thyagarajan acknowledged sending the email after being contacted by phone, but says that the Central West only pulled out of hosting the event because USACA management ignored and failed to respond to a series of emails requesting approval for organizational aspects of the event.

“Everything you send in an email seems to go into a black hole,” said Thyagarajan. “I know there are vested interests at play.”

Mohamed claims that the region sent him a budget that included a rate of $95 per night for hotel rooms during the tournament, but that he recently researched and found a similar-style hotel in the Plano area for $39 per night. Thyagarajan disputes this.

“If he’s able to show me a quote for a Holiday Inn at $40 a night, show me it,” said Thyagarajan.

When Mohamed was asked why volunteers are tasked with the responsibility to negotiate hotel rates and other aspects of tournament budgets when he is a full-time paid employee who can take care of such matters, he said he will most likely have to do so in the future.

“Traditionally, we’ve left it to the regions because they’re familiar with the local businesses and can negotiate better rates, but apparently we’re going to have to change that process,” said Mohamed.

Mohamed was also asked why the matter of researching and deciding on acceptable hotel rates was not done in March or April rather than waiting until the last minute. “We should have looked at that earlier, but we’re depending on the regions to get us that budget,” said Mohamed in reply. “Historically, what we’d do is let the hosting regions organize with a hotel and put together a budget on what it would cost.”

Thyagarajan does not understand why the hotel rates were an issue when the payment is ultimately USACA’s responsibility.

“At the end of the day, the hotel was going to be paid directly by USACA,” said Thyagarajan. “They didn’t even have to go through the region.”

“The fundamental issue here is to be able to go lock in the grounds with the city, to be able to pay the contractors for the renovation of the pitch, the ground set up – tents, tables, chairs - meals and water” said Thyagarajan, saying that the Central West was given a task of assembling the aforementioned aspects of the tournament with a budget of $13,000. The budget was separate from any costs relating to hotels. “It is wrong and untruthful for them to say they could not come to an agreement. If they had a budget issue, why didn’t they come to us? Can we slash this or that? We never had that discussion. For them to say we had a budget issue, it’s plain lying.”

“There’s no reason for them to do this unless it was all a sham in the first place. I know the fact that our regional director [Ahmed Jeddy] stood up against some of these things happening at USACA board level obviously swung some of the thought process in a different way at the leadership level.”

Comments

 

openingbat said:

1) If you break it down, this is simply an issue of logistics!  If everyone is aligned to the common goal of having a successful tournament, you would expect minor adjustments along the way.   Definitely not drastic changes!  

2) Generally, for a tournament that is expected to showcase cricket's best talent, you would expect constant dialog and greater harmony among the organizers - from planning to execution.

3) Ground-level organization for a national level tournament demands more than 3 weeks of planning.  I know of a July 4 tournament in NJ, a privately organized one, for which planning began in March!  Why?  Because that is how much time you need to notify players, to organize tickets, hotels, and most importantly, sponsors!  

4) S-P-O-N-S-O-R-S can help you expand the budget - so you can look at things more strategically!  This is not rocket science!  There are benefits from associating with a national tournament!  My view is that USACA can substantially more on the sponsorships front.

Venu

May 27, 2011 6:24 AM
 

Goldenduck74 said:

Isn't "smoke and mirrors" Dainty's only way of communicating to people?

Anyway, as posted elsewhere -

Surely the way forward with all national events is to put the events out to tender and having chosen a venue all the details, budgets, MOUs etc should all be signed off months in advance.  With less than a month to go, the priority should be about publicisng the event, venues etc - not changing the venue altogether because of differences over hotel prices if other reports are to be belived.  For example as we're half-way through 2011, now should be the time to put to tender all 2012 events, with a view to selecting a venue by August and then finalising all details by October latest.  The tender documents will already detail most of the arrangements anyway, so won't be as much work bringing everything together once chosen.

May 27, 2011 6:56 AM
 

openingbat said:

@Ramesh:  Thanks for taking the time to clarify each point!  I also saw the chronology of events.  The whole affair was surreal!  As if the outcome was planned!

May 29, 2011 4:37 AM
 

Goldenduck74 said:

@ Ramesh

Why not publish or at least circulate the comlpete paper-trail or email exchange, so that people in the leagues who blindly vote for Dainty and co can finally see what they're voting for?

In much the same way as FIFA is is now unravelling with allegations of corruption and underhand dealing, perhaps it's time that the same thing happened with the USACA, and people finally see real evidence of what goes on with Dainty and his puppet GM.

May 29, 2011 6:53 AM
 

openingbat said:

venu@dreamcricket.com

May 30, 2011 5:56 AM
 

Goldenduck74 said:

Ramesh - I've emailed you separately, but I genuinely think it's well worth immediately publishing all emails and communications with USACA regarding the timeline behind this event being pulled.

Irrespective of interest from sponsors, this event should have been underwritten by the USACA, and part of the tendering process.  If there's been some dodgy dealing going on, I think all the stakeholders within the game, both within the USA and at ICC level should see exactly what went on - particularly if it involves the democratically (sort of) elected President or salaried General Manager.

May 31, 2011 12:13 PM

DreamCricket strongly disapproves of spam and we appreciate your taking the time to report this abuse to us so we can remove it accordingly. If you find any content or comments to be inappropriate, abusive or infringing other people's copyright please report it. To report abuse, please email us at content@dreamcricket.com.

This Blog

Syndication

Tags