in Search

USA Cricketer

USA Cricket: Why is USACA paying Robin Singh if he's having a "bad experience" working for USACA?

Now, you can get all the USA Cricket updates via Facebook.   Also follow us on Twitter via @dreamcricket

By Peter Della Penna (on Twitter)

Friday afternoon at the IPL, the Mumbai Indians team was on its way to defeat at the hands of the Pune Warriors when sideline reporter Shibani Dandekar pulled aside Mumbai Indians head coach Robin Singh, who also sometimes acts as USA’s “coach” and other times their “technical advisor”, for a brief interview in the 10th over of Mumbai’s failed chase.

After Dandekar got a few questions out of the way regarding the state of the match and the quality of Mumbai’s fielding unit, she threw in a question about USA cricket, which may have caught the eyes and ears of viewers in America.

“A little birdie told me that you also coached the US Women’s team for the qualifiers,” said Dandekar, referencing the squad that competed in November at the 2011 ICC Women’s World Cup Qualifier in Bangladesh. “What was that experience like?”

“Well that was pretty bad,” Singh blurted out. He may have been candid but he was also quite ungracious. However, the worst was yet to come.

“I think it was the first time I was doing women’s cricket,” said Singh. “It’s very very different. I mean, you have to drop your mental standards with them. It’s a total change. It’s absolutely different.”

Dandekar then tried to offer a chance for Singh to perhaps take back some of what he just said. “But you enjoyed it…” Dandekar responded back to him.

Singh took a few moments before offering a half-hearted and utterly unconvincing, “Yeah….” mixed in with a shoulder shrug. “I mean it’s different. You have to rethink how you strategize and so forth.”

Maybe it’s time for USACA to have a rethink about how to strategize their use of financial resources towards a “technical advisor” or “coach” who doesn’t sound terribly enthusiastic about being involved with US cricket and is ready to insult the intelligence of female players with what can only be characterized as sexist remarks. Singh saying he had to drop his “mental standards” when dealing with female cricketers implies they are intellectually inferior to male athletes he coaches.

I wonder what the female players and supporters of United States cricket have to say about that. It’s a cheap, pathetic statement one would expect out of someone living in the 1950s. The only amusing part about it is that it’s coming from the guy who sources have indicated was the brains behind sending Abhimanyu Rajp in to bat at number three against Ireland last month at the 2012 ICC World Twenty20 Qualifier in Dubai.

Let’s look at Robin Singh’s track record so far in US cricket:

- 1st place finish (out of six teams) with the USA U-19 team at the 2011 ICC Americas U-19 tournament in Florida. The standard of competition was scraping the bottom of the barrel at that event.
- USA U-19 is swept in a four-match series by West Indies U-19 in Florida last July.
- 7th place finish (out of 10 teams) at the 2011 ICC U-19 World Cup Qualifier in Ireland. USA fails to qualify for 2012 ICC U-19 World Cup.
- 8th place finish (out of 10 teams) at the 2011 ICC Women’s World Cup Qualifier in Bangladesh. USA fails to qualify for 2013 ICC Women’s World Cup.
- 12th place finish (out of 16 teams) at the 2012 ICC World Twenty20 Qualifier in the UAE. USA fails to qualify for 2012 ICC World Twenty20.

Singh claims that he had a “bad experience” with the USA Women’s team, but on the evidence above, it looks like USA Cricket as a whole has had a very bad experience with Robin Singh. Why does USACA continue to let him fleece their tiny bank account if he’s having a “bad experience” with US cricket?

Image (right) - Robin Singh [Courtesy: Peter Della Penna/DreamCricket]

He blames his experience with the US women’s team on having to drop his “mental standards” when coaching them. However, he also said that he had never coached women before. Clearly, this is an admission that he was unqualified and unprepared for the duties he was assigned to carry out in coaching the USA Women’s team in Bangladesh, yet he had no issues swooping into Dhaka like a vulture to snatch a paycheck from USACA. It’s also interesting to note that after Singh’s “bad experience” with the women’s team in November, he didn’t have any issues parachuting himself into the men’s touring party in the UAE last month to collect another easy paycheck as a “technical advisor”.

Let’s look at the results again: one success against substandard competition followed by four overwhelming failures. Each failure was worse than the previous one. Singh has shown no interest in coming to help players with practice and training on US soil prior to entering tournaments. Rather, he conveniently shows up on site as a tournament is about to get underway for a shameless cash grab.

Muhammad Ali once said, “The fight is won or lost far away from the witnesses – behind the lines, in the gym, and out there on the road, long before I dance under those lights.” Conversely, Singh and USACA’s administration feel they can cut corners to achieve success by sending teams to show up at tournaments with little or no preparation beforehand and just expect them to win. What was that again about dropping mental standards?

[Views expressed in this article are those of the author. If you have differing views or opinions, we respect those views and urge you to provide your feedback - both positive and negative - in the comments section.]

Comments

 

dans1976dans said:

This article is in poor taste and unbecoming of you Peter.  I think Robin's comments were appropriate because our women's team did not have much experience or skill and it would have been a big mental adjustment for him to coach them.  I'm just seeing a lot of negativity in your recent articles while the objectivity becoming of a good reporter is missing.  US cricket community is missing out on the big picture which you are not providing.

April 7, 2012 6:21 AM
 

timmyj51 said:

Dont' think the article's out of line.  Let's face it; coaching the USA teams, whether

men's or women's, is like working at McDonalds;  something

you only take cause you can't find anything better.  Like everything else with

American cricket coaching has to be done radically different from they way

its done in the rest of the cricket world.  If USACA had any foresight or

savvy they'd know it'll take a very  special person to coach USA teams, someone who knows he's working within extreme limitations yet won't let

that stop him from moving forward. Certainly all the USA "coaches" so far haven't fit that bill.  My adivice: stay away from "established", "experienced" coaches and

find some unknown who's innovative and  highly motivated to make an impact

despite the limitations of the position.

April 7, 2012 8:48 AM
 

DC_Cricketer said:

Grow up Peter. I agree with dans1976dans completely. You are looking for negativity around US cricket and publishing it at every given opportunity. To me dropping mental standards is about dropping his thinking & planning process as USA women's team is still in nascent stage and still learning ABC of cricket. I don't see any sexist or racist element in that argument. However, I agree that he could have been a bit more politically correct.

What needs to change is USACA and the way they handle their coaches. The fact is we don't have a system to manage players and we have no clue how to manage coaches.

April 7, 2012 10:25 AM
 

conrad said:

Not very smart thing to say on international tv but he is a very blunt guy. He must not have intentions of working with US cricket in the future or thinks that will make usaca change their approach to national teams??? who knows? Peter do you homework and report responsibly...what is the basis for your statement of him not showing interest in coaching on US soil and not having teams receive adequate preparation? He is the biggest advocate of having training camps (not weekend camps or 1 wk camps before a tournament) and many practice games long before a tournament is on the horizon. Singh wants to be in the US full time but USACA isn't having any of it. Soon usaca will frustrate him out of us cricket if he isn't already. And Peter, your objectivity is lacking because that track record would be the same regardless of the coach. But you are right that usaca is wasting their money hiring him without a long term plan.  

April 7, 2012 10:27 AM
 

Texan101 said:

Who is Robin Singh? Whats so great about him? All he cares about is pocketing the mighty $$$$ thrown at him by USACA administrators who just wants to please him due to whatever the reason. Its not nice to say about the things he said about USA Women's team. He knew the level of players before he took the job. Dc_cricketer and dans 1976 he was only there to collect the pay check and I don't blame him for that but its a real stupid thing to say what he said. He could have said there is big difference in level of cricket in USA and say India. We need a local guy full time coach who would have done a far better job for USACA for the amount of money we spent on the 4-5 stints he has done. Need a person with long term vision and I am sure you can find it. If not here then somewhere else who can come here and do the job. Peter you are right we dont need to waste our money on those big names( and he is just a name nothing else if he behaves like that).

April 7, 2012 3:31 PM
 

beeji said:

What may be unsaid in Robin's statements is that squad selection and team selection for any US team is highly political with the likes of G(o)D interfering from afar.  Dont forget that deserving several women players were excluded by G(o)D from the one that went to Bangladesh so the quality was going to be that much worse.  Robin's record with the US team might be poor but he can only work with what he is given and therein lies the problem.  Squad and team selection in US cricket at the national level is steeped in currying favors, rampant parochialism, incompetence amongst selectors and support staff, and even outright corruption at the highest levels.  Peter would do well to report on some of those which I am sure he has seen in person.   That is the much larger problem, not who the external coach is and isn't and what he has done or hasn't done.

April 8, 2012 4:19 AM
 

hkgrohan said:

Having watched the man in action in Ireland, I can only say that there's a lot more to this. I hear the senior players had positive things to say -- I don't think the same has been true at the U-19 level, and what I saw bears that out. Completely disengaged - though I can't speak to how much of that was his fault versus the fault of some of the other individuals involved and how they were "running" things. Anyone who coaches US cricket has to accept that it's a step down - of course it is.

It's a shame - I've found Robin Singh to be a good guy in the past, and by most accounts he did a good job when engaged by HKG as a coach. Which is why I wonder if it's at least in part all the shenanigans around our game that have an effect here.

April 8, 2012 11:09 AM

DreamCricket strongly disapproves of spam and we appreciate your taking the time to report this abuse to us so we can remove it accordingly. If you find any content or comments to be inappropriate, abusive or infringing other people's copyright please report it. To report abuse, please email us at content@dreamcricket.com.

This Blog

Syndication

Tags